Personality Disordered Society, noted again by someone else

Please read this column by David Limbaugh at today, and note he says it exactly as I have:  self absorbed, hypocritical, insolent (he uses that word at the end of the column), and the thugs/twits that are the Democrats.

“Let them [Democrats/Liberals] keep it up. Let them keep rioting, destroying property and hurting people in the name of love and harmony. Let them continue to suppress speech in the name of democracy. Let them demean and curse President Trump in the name of civility.”

But, where do the alleged majority of responsible, appropriate, limit setting citizens proceed from here after this garbage going on since November 9 2016?  What, are all these people who know better going to wait for someone else to step in, to save the day, to miraculously restore common sense, insight, and better judgment??

Well, after 6 months of Louts/Regressives/Libelous continuing to escalate and just replicate the most disgusting, immature, and insulting behaviors, much less the flagrant violence by actions if not hideous language on a daily basis, when do people say “enough!”  I think that time has certainly passed.  So, are we really going to have heroes come in and save us?  No.

Oh, and just to remind readers I have no partisan agenda, what the hell are Republicans thinking, when they just duplicate Democrat garbage?  What the hell is going on with political representation these days, do they even understand the premise of Einstein’s quote about what really is insanity??  Or maybe these really are our role models…

I leave you with this equally heinous excuse of a column by an alleged mental health care provider who is right in noting Trump is a pathological Narcissist, but, why stop there?  Where is the criticism of the antisocials leading the party of Democrats, the Clintons and Obama?

And by the way, where is both the American Psychiatric Society and the American Psychological Society in disciplining this bullshit of overt malfeasance by these providers, making diagnostic statements without providing direct assessment interactions with their accused in the major media, which is clearly a violation of professional decorum?!

Umm, you’re not reading my writings at major media sites, are you?!


Image result for image of characters of clinton and trump

this picture definitely works for me, Clinton really would be running around screaming “off with their heads”, while we are seeing the Mad Hatter front and center!

ugly truths and the diseased electorate that fuels them

So, as I type this post, the Repugnocants, and boy, that is such an accurate, analogous term for Republicans, they are repugnant and can’t do their jobs with any level of respectable responsibility, have taken on Obamacare in their own dumbass way.

And no, the Senate will not save the House Repugnocants, because this is about party, not the public.  These are over 300 idiots in the halls of Congress who are only focused about keeping their jobs, not doing them.  Well, really all 545 because the Demon-craps are no better, as they show us day in and out as well.

Because if the Repugnocants were DOING their jobs, they would not be doing fairly much what the shit hole aisle opposites, the Demon-craps, did 7 plus years ago:  passing a law they did not read, did not care would fuck up the ability of providers to serve the public appropriately, tried to be exempt from having to participate in the very law they wrote, and most importantly, screwing up both equally not affording nor effectively accessing health care as patients, which is the truth by the way.  Again, the messengers saying otherwise are affiliated and dedicated to a partisan agenda, not a public one, but, one has to ask the important and clarifying questions to find out those pesky truths.

And what are those pesky truths?  Well, to most likely piss off many readers, let’s have the most brutal moment of candor to understand why either Obamacare or Trumpcare, as it will be hereafter, is a monumental failure:

*people die, doctors can’t change that rule, and people can’t handle death overall.

*health care is not an infinite resource, and thus someone will be denied access, not to care in general, but to certain care interventions.

*choice should be a right, but it is not without costs, both financial and other elements that amount to a “cost”, and thus is not without having to weigh all the pros and cons to said choice before making it.

*finally, as I have limited time for this post right now, people who make rules and limits for the majority of others that are ruled and the writers of said laws and boundaries don’t participate in these rules/limits, well, says how wonderful those laws/boundaries are, eh?!  Again, deeds not words are what define us…

So, soak up those points, and then wonder why irregardless of who is in charge in Washington D.C., they fuck us over and over and then act indignant, entitled, and self righteous.  And, hypocritical and insolent too, as well as reveal themselves to be the thugs and twits they truly are.  S.H.I.T.T.s, remember from prior posts.

OH, to tie in the latter part of the title, it isn’t just the physically diseased of the electorate, but the socially and accountable lapses in judgment by the masses of said electorate that gives us these cretins as rulers.  Yeah, here it comes yet again, it isn’t the politicians who suck, but, the public.

Enjoying that metastatic diseased hope there, folks???

You will for the next 4-6 years until the next bunch of idiots change the rules yet again, but, are they really different at the end of the day…

Addendum May 5th 12Noon:

Ben Shapiro says it better:

“There is no right to health care. You do not have the right to put a gun to my wife’s head (she’s a family physician) and demand care, or demand that the government do so. Rights pre-exist government, and government is maintained in order to preserve those rights. That is what the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence proclaimed. There is a right to access to health care, but once you declare a right to health care, only compulsion can achieve the realization of such a right. Passing the AHCA may move the health insurance industry in the right direction. But by proclaiming it a “repeal and replace,” as Trump and the Republicans have done, they’ve endorsed government-guaranteed health care, and then wrongly slapped the “free market” label on it. That’s a disaster in the making. The shortcomings of the AHCA will now be blamed on the free market rather than on the government. At least when Obamacare failed, people knew to blame big government; if the AHCA fails, people will blame deregulation. That will be Republicans’ fault.”

Yeah, good luck with doctors who agree to be slaves in the next 5 years or so!

Colleges teaching antisocial dogma

What is going on at “Institutions of higher learning”, God, the irony of that term, people who need to be institutionalized, for just being high and not learning anything of healthy substance, but just preaching antisocial dogma:

Endless repeating of lies,

no remorse if not flagrant advocating for violence against dissent,

being harmful to others, and relishing the moment,

and ongoing mockery of healthy boundaries and basic foundations to appropriate expectations and beliefs that this country and culture expect.

All of these are the basic premises to antisocial traits.  And thus, we have a generation of S.H.I.T.T.s coming out of colleges the past few years and these next 10 years if this garbage being sold by professors, administrators, and the student leaders of this hostility and ugly narrative is not quickly rendered marginalized and ostracized!

Oh, if you missed it in prior comment at another post, S.H.I.T.T. stands for

Self Absorbed, Hypocritical, Insolent, Thugs/Twits.

Image result for image of students rioting in classroom

aren’t these just college students in waiting?…


So, this next rendition of screw the public, the Republicans will dump Obamacare and give us Trumpcare, and, then exempt themselves from the legislation, just like their ostomy bag suckers/aisle opposites the Democrats did in 2010?

“The party’s newly revised AHCA not only eliminates some of Obamacare’s most popular coverage protections, which is a dubious enough move on its own from a political standpoint, but also requires that insurers continue guaranteeing those protections to members of Congress.”

Yeah, what did The Who say at the end of “Won’t Get Fooled Again”, “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss”?

All of them, S.H.I.T.T.s, Self-absorbed Hypocritical Insolent Thugs/Twits.  The party designation only directs you to one side of the polluted aisle of the Republocrat Party, who just want to keep their jobs, not do them.

And over 50% of “the public sucks” reminds us to “fuck hope”…

Another state to avoid

Bernie Sander has to be one of the most annoying people to ever be a United States Senator.  He really thinks his pathetic run for President last year has elevated him to be spokesman for earth, much less this country.  Read this ignoramus comment today:

Everything to this loser is not only a right, but a need and an expectation.  Sorry, I will be the only one with the gall to say it:  Bernie Sanders, would you shut the f— up, retire, and become irrelevant, PLEASE!?!?

But, once again, Vermont is another example of conshituency, er, constituency that is at least clueless if not hideously complicit as long as this loser prowls the halls of the Senate.  And you know why he is an “Independent”?  Because if he demanded to be part of the Demon-craps outright, they would eventually ostracize him publicly.

Really, this guy is the textbook schmuck of schmucks…

It’s getting to the point if I want to live in a state that has ocean front property I will definitely have to go South of Virginia at least, maybe even consider the Gulf of Mexico for salt water access…

Image result for image of sarcastic Bernie Sanders

addendum 10 minutes later:

“Here’s the thing about Sanders-ism: it’s seductive because it labels things unfair that people don’t like, then suggests no solutions to them. That’s childish, but it’s effective. Broadband internet may not be a right, but we like broadband internet, so now we’ll call it a right. It’s convenient politics. It’s also the road to government-created tyranny.”

Why you don’t have people over 70 years old in government positions, they are clueless, inflexible, and out of touch with reality, at least until proven otherwise.  And yeah, that goes for Trump too, as well as what seems to be about half the people who represent the Demon-craps in Congress.

Millennials are the generation of the future, and they want the party of the past to represent them?  That isn’t just insanity, that is Einstein quote to the core, keep doing the same shit over and over and expecting different results.

But, what is the average IQ of Millennials these days?…

Is Abortion an antisocial concept?

I am sure there will be some reader who comes along and just freaks out after reading that title, but, the point of this post is not to pick a side to the abortion debate.  Frankly, I have two fairly inflexible points to abortion in general:

* First, the abortion debate should be argued almost solely by women, as men don’t have the ability to carry a child and in the end women do most of the work in raising a child.  Yes, that is first of two black and white points to this pervasively grey debate.

* Second, abortion is a choice, but, one that should be weighed for some duration of time, as abortion is NOT a form of birth control, ever, point two that is black and white.

So, where am I going with the title anyway?  Well, while the grey to the debate is when does a fetus become a viable human being, there is a point where performing an abortion could be argued in a court of law as an act of murder.  So, what type of person willingly takes the life of another without the victim being a direct threat to others?

Again, not a black and white determination, but, as one of the most glaring examples of incredible inappropriateness to abortion, I ask people to look at the Gosnell conviction after his arrest in 2011.  Here is one take to the story:

I think, no, I know this man was an antisocial, because of the way he cared, or, rather minimally cared for women as patients overall.  But, the bigger picture is how does abortion get used by a country once the citizens as a majority accept the practice.  It invariably becomes defacto ways of population control, tries to control gender percentages and even other genetic factors, and worst of all, promotes that pregnancy is a convenience.  See China as example 1 to this?

So, to not berate this topic further, just ask oneself this about those who are the most outspoken and inflexible about the access to abortion:  do they promote lies and minimize consequences from the procedure, show little if any remorse for those who had abortions and then had post procedure regrets, reinforce there are no real consequences for those providers who cause harm to people who had inadequate if not malpractice procedures that had harmful sequelae from the procedure, and finally, mock and demean the effort to discuss boundaries and concerns for abortion on demand irregardless of what length of the pregnancy the procedure is being performed?

Hmm, if one answers yes to any if not all to these suppositions about abortion supporters, and you agree with my basic definition to what is the antisocial, well, aren’t ardent abortion right advocates acting like antisocials?

And who do almost all of these zealot abortion advocates associate with?

Yeah, Demon-craps, Louts, Regressives, and Libelous.

Think about it, but, in a grey way?

Image result for image of protesters facing each other over abortion

I had to look at a lot of pictures, but, this one sums up the point, isn’t it incongruent for a a person to weigh abortion on demand never deserves an apology? (yeah, I see it, the signs do NOT say “never”, but isn’t that inferred?)

Isn’t that the attitude of an antisocial in this regard?

What the hell is wrong with everybody these days?!

It is simply amazing and unfathomable, I read fairly much daily at and, and lately they run multiple stories that just blow my mind about the pervasive dereliction of duty, much less any honest or sincere interest in the public welfare by Democrats/ Liberals/Progressives.

Wow, they really do give validation to what Carlin said over 20 years ago about what is really wrong in politics:  “The public sucks, fuck hope!”

These people are beyond sick, they are really are bordering on sociopathic now, openly advocating for assassinating the President, college students demanding professors be fired and curriculum be set to what students want, this ongoing mindless push to keep illegal immigrants in this country who are literally raping, pillaging and disrupting the country.  And on and on about how the Louts/Regressives/Libelous just want to cruel, er, rule and tell anyone who even tries to dissent not only to shut up, but bash them in the face sometimes before attempting a verbal dissuasion.

What the hell is wrong with these people, and why does the general public who have some clue to what is appropriate, responsible, and acceptable continue to put up with these overflowing colostomy bags of diseased laden-ed stool collection of citizens, politicians, celebrities, and fellow neighbors???

Yeah, one can accuse me of being equally heinous by writing a post like this, but, I am beyond being willing to dialogue and negotiate with people who redefine the terms “rigid”, “inflexible”, “zealot”, and “extremist”.  People who advocate for nothing else but eroding healthy and respectful boundaries of society, who want to promote agendas that degrade authority that is accountable, and most of all, just want to be able to do what ever the fuck they want and have no concern how it affects other people, I am to dialogue with this?!

This is pure antisocial shit at it’s worst, and why I write about it.  For the transition to what I have wanted to write about for the past week since reading it for my latest CME course, Hatherleigh has a CME program called Directions in Psychiatry, and in Volume 36 was a lesson called “The Detrimental Impact of Maladaptive Personality on Public Mental Health:  A Challenge for Psychiatric Practice”, by Michael Pascal Hengartner, PhD.

And amazingly enough, I found the lesson as previously posted in this following link:

I am sorry I am being a bit lazy not copying all that I hope is worthy to readers to gleam from this article, but, the couple of points I will note here for readers are the following, but, read it all as one can find the time:

“Thus, taken together, these findings clearly demonstrate that persons with maladaptive personality traits are at highly increased risk for the development of subsequent mental disorders and other psychological difficulties. As a consequence, these at-risk patients should be observed and followed carefully once they have entered the health care system. Prerequisite to this recommendation is of course a thorough assessment of personality in every single patient as early as possible in the clinical evaluation process.”

And also this:

“Finally, personality not only influences service utilization but also the efficacy of and compliance with mental health treatments. For instance, a large longitudinal clinical study with over 600 patients with major depressive disorder revealed that low neuroticism and high extraversion and openness predict response to both pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy (73). Addressing a similar aim but using a completely different setting, which compared group vs. internet-based cognitive behavior therapy, Spek et al. (74) found that lower baseline neuroticism significantly predicts better outcomes in both treatments. Based on a comprehensive literature review, Mulder (75) noted that personality, particularly neuroticism, generally predicts worse treatment outcomes, but that this association is not unequivocally clear and apparently depends on the study design. In contrast to that rather cautious verdict, a meta-analysis of the effect of PDs on treatment outcome in depression corroborates the detrimental impact of maladaptive personality traits (76). The robust result of this study revealed that concurrent PD doubles the risk for a poor treatment outcome in major depression across various treatments (pharmacological and psychological alone, or combined).”

Yeah, what is treatment resistant versus a separate diagnostic factor that goes beyond what general psychiatry seems willing to attempt to treat these days!

Just so readers understand the role of neuroticism, I will add what the author noted at the beginning of the article to make it more coherent for those not as well versed in the point to this factor in personality traits, the major five being neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness.

“There is compelling evidence from two meta-analyses that specifically neuroticism and to a lesser extent also low conscientiousness (i.e., disorderliness and impulsivity) substantially relate to mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders. Low agreeableness (i.e., antagonism and aggressiveness) is associated with externalizing disorders and introversion specifically with internalizing disorders (41, 42). Moreover, neuroticism constitutes a broad vulnerability factor for the co-occurrence within and between both internalizing and externalizing disorders (43, 44). Thus, in sum, cross-sectional epidemiological studies provide compelling evidence that neuroticism in particular is strongly associated with the occurrence and co-occurrence of all common mental disorders as expressed by large effect sizes of d > 0.8 or r > 0.5. Neuroticism is also the most important trait underlying general personality dysfunction and specific PD diagnoses (14, 17, 20). It consistently follows that the severity of personality pathology as well as PD diagnoses substantially relate to co-occurring mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders (32, 45) and to the number of co-occurring mental disorders.”

So, maybe this ties it all in, maybe not, but, I will say this, the pervasive Personality Disordered component to what is going on in this country, and probably in many other countries as well, is really doing incredible damage being either ignored, minimized, or just plain foolishly tolerated.  You folks figure it out, myself, I will continue to write about it and hope the word will be either credibly entertained, or, maybe other options be considered?

I got no picture to end with, sorry, maybe I’ll edit later with a shot…

addendum 5 minutes later:

add this link to show what is going on:

(all from the article but just bolded the ending to maximize effect)

“At UC Berkeley, the Division of Equity and Inclusion has hung banners throughout campus reminding students of their place within the ruthlessly competitive hierarchy of victimhood. One depicts a black woman and a Hispanic man urging fellow students to “create an environment where people other than yourself can exist.” That’s not meant as hyperbole. Students have been led to believe they are at personal risk from circumambient bigotry. After the February riots at Berkeley against Mr. Yiannopoulos, a columnist in the student newspaper justified his participation in the anarchy: “I can only fight tooth and nail for the right to exist.” Another opined that physical attacks against supporters of Mr. Yiannopoulos and President Trump were “not acts of violence. They were acts of self-defense.”

Man, scary is a woeful understatement…

That is the antisocial narrative, in my opinion:  “because I don’t like it or don’t agree with it, my attitude and expectations not only trump others, but fuck others!”

Near the end this, “Many observers dismiss such ignorant tantrums as a phase that will end once the “snowflakes” encounter the real world. But the graduates of the academic victimology complex are remaking the world in their image. The assumption of inevitable discrimination against women and minorities plagues every nonacademic institution today, resulting in hiring and promotion based on sex and race at the expense of merit.”

Yeah, let this brew without appropriate redirection, and what do you get?

Review human history and get back to me!

Image result for image of burning down university

And this jerk wants to be the next Governor of Maryland, asshole!

They say politics is personal and close to home, well, this schmuck has made it personal and close to home, my county.  So, I just tweeted him and his jerks my well wishes that illegal immigration affects him, his family, and his supporters as negatively as possible, and may karma rule.

Yeah, sorry, those who are grounded and realistic about what is the truth about illegal immigration really hope the clueless and complicit politicians and celebrities get royally fucked by some illegal alien.  Watch their support and diehard fanaticism evaporate quicker than a raindrop on hot concrete as the sun comes out!

And I want it, I don’t care how cruel, rude, or insensitive it sounds.  Only when people are affected by their own dumbass and partisan agendas personally do they have their moment of brutal realization.  And if for some pathetic reason they still don’t get it after being harmed and disrupted, well, then let nature finish the job for us.

Wow, politicians who brazenly care more for those who are not legal citizens than those who are, and think they will stay in office to fuck us further?!

One day soon, TV, media, or the internet will appease me, I hope!  I look forward to the tears, anguish, and genuine pain from these pricks.  Again, Karma, bring it on for these losers, and may the coverage make it even more intense!

Sorry readers, I hate these illegal immigrant loving losers!

another reason to hate Maryland…

Again, why the combination of Democrats and exclusively allowing men to set policies for women shows why this state is so f—-d up:

I’m counting the days I will stay in this state, guarantee it!

Image result for sarcastic image of the State of Maryland

This sums it up for me, note we have had past Democratic Governors who almost word for word say how much the East and West sides of the state suck.  Gee, because there is not a predominance of Democrat voters there?…

Art really is life, eh?

Watch the clip from the movie Virtuosity, then wonder why the hideous horrendous murder by that piece of shit who is now thankfully dead, well, is it the shooter alone, or the audience that seems to crave this antisocial mayhem that is the root of the evil?

If you don’t know what I am talking about, well, here is the horrific video:

More to come about this pervasive antisocial mayhem that is just growing, in my opinion, logarithmically, but, do we address it, or